#AskNicholas: Smaller buses and stop spacing

Question: 1) Why do bus systems not use smaller buses for low-usage routes? 2) What is the optimum gap/distance between stops?

Nicholas: Using smaller buses doesn't usually reduce costs much and may actually cost more. Smaller buses are cheaper to buy but generally don't last as long, both in time and number of miles travelled, so they must be replaced more often. (If you can solve this problem, you can probably make a lot of money!) Smaller buses may use less fuel, but fuel is a minor cost compared to labor costs, including the driver and maintenance, which are usually the same regardless of the type of bus you have. Fairfax County found that the larger buses, which are about 3/4 of the buses in US public transit fleets, were cheaper over their entire lifespan.


Nicholas: Richmond recently started applying a five-stops-per-mile stop spacing policy. The main advantage of consolidating stops like this is that you eliminate much of the time a bus spends slowing down, opening doors, and accelerating. If you go from 20 stops with one person waiting at each to 10 stops with two people waiting at each, you save all that slow time and only add the extra second it takes to load the second passenger. Optimal stop spacing for buses is usually about a quarter mile, but varies depending on the street layout: Long blocks may have a stop at every cross street while short blocks at every third cross street.

However, this doesn't mean people have to walk a quarter mile extra to get to the closest bus stop! Imagine walking to Broad Street in downtown Richmond, an area with short blocks that could have stops every third cross street (at 3rd, 6th, 9th, etc). If you're coming on 3rd, 6th, or 9th, your bus stop is right there. If you're coming on 4th, 7th, or 10th, then you'll walk just one block west. If you're coming on 5th, 8th, or 11th, then you'll walk just one block east. At most you're walking one block extra, which might be just 300 ft (1/18th of a mile).

Of course, each situation is different, so if you have a large, popular destination you might want an additional stop. In areas with low ridership buses rarely stop, so stops can be more frequent.

#AskNicholas: National decline in transit use?

A while back we collected a bunch of great, frequently-asked, transit-related questions from folks. We passed them along to Nicholas, our resident expert, and now have a stack of answers to share with you. If you've got something to #AskNicholas, just let us know!


Question: CNN has reported that public transit use is down by 6% in America's major cities (Boston, LA, NYC, DC). Is a new system expected to be effective when established ones are on the decline?

Nicholas: Transit ridership in major cities has dropped for a variety of reasons (and we don't really know why), but we do know that ridership is heavily affected by the cost of car travel and the reliability/convenience of transit.

Gas prices in 2011-2014 were about $3.50 a gallon, while in 2015 they dropped a dollar and in 2016 they dropped another 25 cents. Everyone makes individual choices as to how to get around, but, on the margins, lower gas prices will reduce transit use and vice versa. There's often a lag as well, as people decide whether or not to buy a new car based on gas prices.

Additionally, many transit systems have not put the necessary money into maintenance, which has caused frequent vehicle and system breakdowns. This is particularly true in the New York City metro area, which has about 40% of the nation's transit trips. New York state, which runs the subway and two of the three commuter rail lines, has severely underinvested in maintenance and that has hurt reliability.

People will deal with longer transit trip times (though this does reduce transit use), but they really hate when they can't depend on transit. Folks who dislike slow, unreliable transit are responding to the same realities as people who dislike slow, unreliable highways, and if transit infrastructure is not kept in a good state, just like roads, people won't plan their lives around it.

GRTC has a very young fleet of buses, now halfway through a full conversion to quieter compressed natural gas, and buses are generally very clean and reliable. The Pulse's dedicated lanes will mean less chance of getting stuck in traffic. Transit agencies that continue to keep their system in good order will be rewarded with higher ridership, so that will always be a focus if we're to keep our system running well.

#AskNicholas: Doors on both sides?

A while back we collected a bunch of great, frequently-asked, transit-related questions from folks. We passed them along to Nicholas, our resident expert, and now have a stack of answers to share with you. If you've got something to #AskNicholas, just let us know!

Question: Do the Pulse buses have doors on both sides?

Nicholas: Pulse buses have doors on the right side only and will stop at stations with curbs on the right only (and moving traffic on the left!). Very few buses exist with doors on both sides, so acquiring them would be expensive, as they'd likely be custom designed and built!